The Empire of Corpses

Wit Studio Fall 2015
6.9
Quality Score
0.38 (Positive)
Audience Mood
7 / 10
Controversy
30,746
MAL Ratings

Synopsis — from MyAnimeList

By the 19th century, humanity has cultivated technology enabling the reanimation of corpses. Unable to experience individual thoughts or emotions, the corpses are programmed by humans to act as laborers in various occupations. This newfound technology, however, comes with a catch. Science may be able to restore the corpses' ability to move, yet it cannot return what every corpse loses at death: the soul. But Doctor Victor Frankenstein, who vanished shortly after his revolutionary work on corpse reanimation, is said to have revived the only corpse in possession of a soul. In pursuit of this scientific knowledge, London medical student John Watson hopes to fulfill his promise to his late partner, Friday. After being scouted by a government agency, Watson is on a hunt to obtain Frankenstein's notes, which he believes hold the key to the secrets of the soul. During his search, Watson uncovers the harsh realities of the developing corpse technology and the price he must pay to advance his research.

Audience Consensus

Audience reception is highly divided, with a strong consensus on the exceptional visual quality provided by Wit Studio. However, opinions diverge sharply on the narrative execution, with many finding the story confusing, poorly paced, and plagued by weak characters, while a minority appreciate the philosophical depth and unique premise despite its flaws.

Strengths

  • Stunning and consistently high-quality animation and art direction by Wit Studio.
  • Visually impressive with detailed backgrounds, character designs, and effects.
  • Interesting and unique premise/concept involving reanimated corpses and philosophical themes.
  • Atmospheric and macabre feel with a well-established Victorian Steampunk setting.

Weaknesses

  • Incoherent and confusing story with significant plot holes and rushed pacing, especially in the second half.
  • Weak character development and often nonsensical or unclear character motivations.
  • Over-reliance on philosophical exposition that doesn't always serve the narrative or characters.
  • Inconsistent characterization and dialogue that can be difficult to follow.
  • Some found the plot to be a rehash or derivative of Frankenstein without sufficient originality.